Resources
Q & A
Glossary
Acronym Guide
Further Reading
Outside the Site
Google Sky
WWT
Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
Flickr
Pinterest
Multimedia, Etc
Images/Illustrations
Animation & Video
Special Features
Chandra Podcasts
Desktop Images
The Big Chandra Picture
Presentations
Handouts
Screen Savers
Audio
Web Shortcuts
Chandra Blog
RSS Feed
Chronicle
Email Newsletter
News & Noteworthy
Image Use Policy
Questions & Answers
Glossary of Terms
Download Guide
Get Adobe Reader
Q&A: Black Holes

Q:
If X-rays are produced by a high-speed collision between an electron and a proton and X-rays are observed to emanate from the cores of galaxies (among other places) why can't we speculate upon a proton star in the center? Why does theory predict that a black hole is accelerating matter that emits X-rays instead of a Protonic star whose electromagnetic strength is attracting electrons that in turn emit the X-rays?

A:
There are two problems with a pure proton star model. First, the repulsive force between the protons would blow it apart, unless gravity was strong enough to prevent it. But if gravity was that strong, the star would collapse to form a black hole. Second, even if a milder version of such a star could exist, with an electrified outer atmosphere, electrons would very quickly accelerate to the star in the manner you describe, produce a bright flash of X-rays and gamma-rays, and then it would all be over because the electric field would have been shorted out, or neutralized. Such as model involving electric fields created temporarily around black holes, has been suggested as a model for gamma ray bursts. See:
http://chandra.harvard.edu/press/01_releases/press_071201.html

Back | Index | Next